SCREW YOU HIPPIE
Unfortunately we didn't
really get to discuss that lovely article about hippies by Ayn Rand during
class but I know we all have something to say about it. If you've forgotten the
article can be summed up thusly (see picture). Essentially its Ayn Rand's bad dream about “hippies” and how far they want to take
conservation. Most of the points that she makes are things we all would agree
with (none of us want to get rid of most or all of our technology do we?) but
that’s the thing nobody ever made any of those arguments. Any conservationist
who would make that argument are almost universally mocked and very few people
agree with them. They’re the crazy fringe extremists not the mainstream
authority on the issue. Ayn is railing against a perceived threat against her
way of life because, communists. Yes Ayn has declared a new Inquisition and now
we must all find the heretics (conservationists) in our midst and get rid of
them so we can maintain our way of life. The conservationists want us to live
like cavemen and die at 35 to preserve the dumb earth…except nobody thinks
that. Conservationists just want what we should all want for the human race to
be able to sustain itself and its habitat so we need to find a balance. Fanaticism
either way is not the way to go it only leads to conflict and division. This
would only delay progress and won’t help anything.
One
of the ways that we do this is to create an enemy out of a group of people who
aren’t really enemies of our cause. For instance many environmentalists like to
get angry with oil companies because they believe they profit directly from the
destruction of the environment and constantly block new research into alternative
fuel sources. They site people who begin to develop new fuel sources and then
never hear about it again. Basically the news in this country love to talk
about something for all of five minutes then never revisit it again. Most oil
companies are working very hard at finding new fuel sources so they can profit
and they love to invest in independent researchers and buy their idea so they can
pump millions into it and develop it much more quickly than any one person can
do on their own. But that’s not news that sells so we just get to hear about
how terrible they are (any oil spill ever). Creating a scapegoat like this only
makes it more difficult to get anything done and slows development to a crawl.
Andy
Catlett
What to say about Andy Catlett? It’s mostly about how great
the old ways were and how we shouldn’t leave them behind. Technology should definitely
not go back to the way it was and some of our ideals do not carry over (read
racism) but certain positive aspects of our society have, sort of, been lost. A
large part of our social interaction is now over the internet or some other
device which some say makes us antisocial. But they seem to forget how it used
to be…
Technology
isn’t really making us any more or any less antisocial than we used to be it’s
simply changing the ways we socialize. Now instead of taking my controller and
memory card over to a friend’s house we just get on the same game at our own
houses. Who’s to say which form is better? They both have their advantages and
disadvantages, it’s really up to everyone’s personal preference. Now let’s look
at a more abstract idea the hurry that we see in society. Many people believe
that we are more stressed nowadays than we ever have been in the past. Wendell
Berry used the contrast between the horse drawn carriage vs the automobile as an
example of how we are more in a hurry than we have been in the past. Many
people would say the amount we work now makes us more stressed than before and
a great example would be my family. My dad has worked many a long hour and
deals with a lot of stress. Certain people (I like these ones) would say that
40-50 years ago he wouldn’t have had to do that and would have been less
stressed and we should go back to that. Then I tell them that 40-50 years ago
my grandfather worked up to 4 jobs simultaneously to provide for the same size
family my dad has (wife and 2 kids). Technology hasn’t really changed a lot of
WHAT we do it’s changed HOW we do it.
Speaking
of retro stuff….
Thanks for reading




If I may, I just want to tell you that this was a gutsy post, but I know that you are the type to speak whatever is on your mind, so this is not necessarily against your nature. Anyway, I do respect this argument because I completely agree. I believe that a lot of environmentalists never base their arguments on anything more than sentiment and obsession over the physical beauty of the earth. They do not think economically, sympathetically, or practically. However, people like you and me run the same risk. We disregard those people simply because we are annoyed by the incredibility of their argument, but we really do not have much of an argument ourselves. Then again, I, personally, don't try to present an argument that I know I don't have; I counter the extreme environmentalists out of defense against the unnecessary, inappropriate attack they launch against my seemingly unfathomable disregard for the preservation of the environment. In the end, people like you and me come out looking like the bad guy, and that bothers me.
ReplyDeleteDrew,
DeleteInteresting that you perceive that you end up being the "bad guy." In reality, diversity of opinion is a necessary component for any long-term discussion worth our time. Please do not hesitate to speak up!
An interesting post. You know what else is interesting. The lateness of this comment!
ReplyDeleteRegardless, I agree with you pretty much on Rand's view. she's looking at environmentalists through her own philosophical lens where regulation is the ultimate evil. Check out my blog on the same topic, and I think you'll find that we share some opinions.