The War is
Won in the Trenches
Ryan Beutin talked briefly about the ‘sexy missions’ vs the
more attainable missions e.g. going to Africa to save all the children from
trafficking (think Machine Gun Preacher) vs taking care of poor children in
your own neighborhood (think Salvation Army). He talked about how most
Christians are not really called to go out and do the glamorous work that will
get them the Nobel Peace Prize but rather doing the grunt work that will
positively affect the people around you. The grunt work, working in the soup
kitchen, serving at the church charity drive, or volunteering on a graffiti clean-up
crew, isn’t going to win you any awards but it will positively impact the
community you live in. I believe that helping your own community grow and
flourish in the long is more important than worrying about people thousands of
miles away for the short term. Very few people have the wealth, time, or ability
to be long term missionaries and make a long lasting impact on a foreign community.
It is difficult to be an outsider and come into make significant change. In
fact, Ryan talked about how most of the time the people we are helping are
actually making fun of us behind our backs because we don’t know exactly what
the needs of that community or the best way to deal with them are. When we help
our own community we are automatically more invested because it is in our own
back yards. Most Christians would do better in an environment where we are
helping our own neighbors because we would already know the people and know how
they can best be helped.
This ideal ties into what Berry and co. have been talking
about when discussing their views on agrarian farming. Small, local farms would
be better suited to fulfilling the specific needs of the community they live in
because they would know what the people want exactly. This would then lead to
better use of the community’s land and preserve their resources. Which leads to
a healthier community overall. Rather than trying to take down a global company
by campaigning on TV or organizing a massive boycott most people should try to
change their own community. If more and more people help their own community then
more communities across the nation will grow and flourish and the better off
our entire nation will be. This would be much simpler than trying to make huge
sweeping changes to our entire nation’s food system right off the bat and most
people would not be able to take that on. So more people are able to participate
and the community becomes stronger as a whole. When we take on challenges that
are incredibly huge and far away from home the harder it is to stay invested
and to make significant change. When we keep things small the problem become more
manageable and we tend to be able to do more meaningful work. Christians should
also keep their goals smaller and more local so they can achieve them more
easily. This would lead to stronger local communities with less problems which
would then, in turn, lead to less problems nationwide and then all across the
world. Few people has what it takes to be the great ‘sexy’ leaders doing all
the glamorous things in life. The rest of us should do the ‘grunt’ work that
doesn’t get noticed but is critical to the success of our mission in life.
Remember the war is won in the trenches.
I definitely appreciate the thought that there is a lot we can do in our own communities and that real work gets done in the nittty-gritty manual labor of life. But I would challenge some of your statements about "sweeping changes to our national food system." I understand what you're saying, but I also know that national polivy can make a huge difference on things like this. People thought that the country wasn't ready for nation-wide same-sex marriage, but here we are, and that may not end discrimination in every way but it does provide a legal way to acceptance for so many people. We've changed the laws involved in the sex trade to help protect people who are trafficked. Grassroots campaigns are one way to change, but so is policy. And this isn't an error in your argument, you are presenting the authors' arguments very well, but I am beginning to wonder if it is an error in the authors' statements. Both methods of change are important.
ReplyDeleteI know this wasn't the main message of your post, but I wanted to ask you about your final statement (and title of the post): "the war is won in the trenches." If our striving to become better Christians in the context of food production is analogous with a war, who exactly is the enemy we are fighting? Is it a spiritual war between the forces of good and evil? Are we battling against people with different viewpoints than our own? Are we staging an uprising against the authorities that prevent a truly Christian environment from being achieved? I know I'm probably stretching your analogy a little farther than you might have intended, but I'm curious.
ReplyDeleteEmily, to your well-stated critique. Whatever big-picture fixes we pursue must be grounded in our homes. Politicians will be corrupt politicians if they have paper-thin characters in the comfort of their homes. Business CEOs will not think twice about pursuing a cheaper bottom line at the cost of exploding a mountain, if they also fail to consider the impact of their grocery buying choices. Any well-reasoned big solution must be grounded on a well-ordered life in a particular place.
ReplyDelete